PENGARUH GAYA KEPEMIMPINAN, MOTIVASI DAN KOMPETENSI TERHADAP KINERJA KARYAWAN PNM MEKAAR, STUDI KASUS KARYAWAN LEVEL ACCOUNT OFFICER DI PNM MEKAAR KOTA BOGOR TAHUN 2021

Prihatina Jati, Zaharuddin Zaharuddin, Ahmad Firdaus, Merphino Soelaksmono

Abstract


The objectives of this research are: 1) To find out and get a study about the influence of work leadership on employee performance. 2) To find out and get a study about the effect of motivation development on employee performance. 3) To find out and get a study about the influence of competence on employee performance. 4) To find out and get a study about the influence of leadership, motivation and competence simultaneously on PNM Mekaar employees at Account Officer level in Bogor City.

The results of this study indicate that: 1) There is an influence of leadership (X1) on employee performance (Y), as evidenced by the tcount value for the X1 variable (Leadership) of 5,225, while the ttable value for n = 80 is 1,990. So 5.225 > 1.990, it can be concluded that partially Leadership (X1) has an effect on Employee Performance (Y). 2) There is Motivation (X2) on Employee Performance (Y), it is proven that the tcount value for the X2 variable (Motivation) is 7388, while the ttable for n = 80 is 1,990. So 7.388> 1.990, it can be concluded that partially motivation (X2) has an effect on employee performance (Y). 3) There is Competence (X3) on Employee Performance (Y), it is proven that the tcount value for the X2 variable (Motivation) is 7,388, while the ttable value for n = 80 is 1,990. So 7.388> 1.990, it can be concluded that partially Motivation (X2) affects Employee Performance (Y).) There is an influence of Leadership (X1), Motivation (X2) and Competence (X3) together on Employee Performance (Y). It is evident from the ANOVA test that the Fcount value is 48.927, while the Ftable ( 0.05) for n = 80 is 2.49. So Fcount > from Ftable ( 0.05) or 48.927 > 2.49 with a significant level of 0.000 because 0.000 < 0.05, it can be said that Leadership (X1), Motivation (X2) and Competence (X3) together or simultaneously have a positive effect on Employee Performance (Y). Based on the calculations in the table above, the effect of the three variables was tested, and based on the Model Summary table, the R Square value was 0.659. This shows that 65.9% Leadership (X1), Motivation (X2), Competence (X3) on Employee Performance (Y) while the remaining 34.1% is influenced by other factors not examined in this study.

Keywords: Work Motivation, Career Development, Competence, Employee Performance


Full Text:

PDF

References


A.A. Anwar Prabu Mangkunegara. 2011. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya

Abdullah, M. 2014. Manajemen dan Evaluasi Kinerja Karyawan. Yogyakarta : Penerbit Aswaja Pressindo.

Akbar, T. A. 2018. Pengaruh Pelatihan dan Motivasi Kerja terhadap Kinerja Karyawan pada PT Telkom Witel Bandung.

Aprianto, Brian & Jacob, A.F. 2013. Pedoman Lengkap Profeisonal SDM Indonesia. Jakarta: PPM Management.

Arfan, D. 2014. Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi terhadap Kinerja Karyawan pada BNI Syariah Cabang Pekanbaru. Fakultas Psikologis Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim, Riau.

Arikunto, S. 2010. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Badriyah, M. 2015. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Cetakan 1. Bandung : CV Pustaka Setia.

Dessler, G. 2015. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Edison, Emron, Anwar, Yohny dan Komariyah, Imas. 2016. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Erlina, Sri Mulyani, 2007. Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis : Untuk Akuntansi dan Manajemen, Cetakan Pertama, USU Press, Medan.

Fuad, Hasim. 2018. Pengaruh Motivasi diri dan Budaya Organisasi Terhadap Kepuasan kerja Pegawai Pada Biro Umum Sekretariat Presiden RI.

Ghozali, Imam. 2005. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS, Edisi Ketiga , Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.

Hasibuan, Malayu S.P. 2012. Manajemen SDM. Edisi Revisi, Cetakan Ke Tigabelas. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

John, H Bernardin, Joyce E. A. Russel. 2013. Human Resource Management, an Experiental Approach, Mc Graw- Hill International Edition. Printed in Singapure.

Jonathan, Sarwono. 2013. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu

Kappagoda, U., Othman, H., & Alwis, G. 2014. Psychological capital and job performance: The mediating role of work attitudes.

Kasmir. 2016. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia (Teori dan Praktik). Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Kreitner Robert dan Kinicki Angelo. 2013. Perilaku Organisasi. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Laksana, Ronna. 2014. Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Bagian Marketing pada PT. Bank Muamalat, Tbk. Cabang Tasikmalaya.

Laksmi Riani, Asri. 2013. Manajemen SDM Masa Kini, Yogyakarta : Graha Ilmu.

Lestari, Sri. 2016. “Pengukuran Kinerja Dengan Pendekatan Balanced Scorecard Pada Rumah Sakit PKU Muhammadiyah Gombong Tahun 2013 dan 2014”. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta.

Mangkunegara. 2011. Manajemen Sumber Daya Perusahaan. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Marwansyah. 2016. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Bandung: CV Alfabeta

Mudrajad Kuncoro. 2013. “Metode Riset untuk Bisnis dan Ekonomi”. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Nugroho, Restu Adi, dkk. 2016. “Pengaruh Komitmen Organisasi, Motivasi Berprestasi dan Gaya Kepemimpinan Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Pt Wangsa Jatra Lestari”.

Pabundu Tika. 2014. Budaya Organisasi dan Peningkatan Kinerja Karyawan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Pasolong, harbani. 2013. Teori administrasi publik. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Priansa Juni, Donni. 2017. Pengembangan Srategi dan Model Pembelajaran Inovatif, Kreatif, dan Prestatif Dalam Memahami Peserta Didik. Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia.

Riduwan dan Sunarto. 2011. Pengantar Statistika untuk Penelitian Pendidikan, Sosial, Ekonomi, Komunikasi, dan Bisnis. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Riduwan. 2010. Skala Pengukuran Variabel-variabel Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Rivai Dan Ella Sagala. 2013. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Untuk Perusahaan, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Rivai, Veithzal. 2011. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia untuk Perusahaan: dari Teori ke Praktik, Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.

Robbins, P. Stephen dan Timothy A. Judge. 2012. Perilaku Organisasi. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Safitri, Erma. 2013. Pengaruh Pelatihan Dan Disiplin Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan. Jurusan Manajemen, Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Negeri Surabaya.

Santoso, Slamet. 2013. Stasistika Ekonomi plus Aplikasi SPSS, Ponorogo: Umpo Press.

Sedarmayanti. 2013. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Sekaran, U. 2006. Metode Penelitian Untuk Bisnis 1. (4th ed). Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Sinambela, Lijan Poltak. 2012. Kinerja Pegawai. Graha Ilmu: Yogyakarta.

Siswadi. 2012. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Sofyandi, Herman. 2013. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Sugiyono. 2006. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.46975/ebp.v5i2.179

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 Published by:

Universitas Mitra Bangsa 

Jl. Tanjung Barat No. 11 Jakarta Selatan

Telp: (021) 7817823  Fax: (021) 7815144

Website: https://umiba.ac.id/